Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 00:29

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
Can I use the LEG PRESS to build muscle?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Former Packers WR makes long touchdown in UFL championship - Acme Packing Company
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
A Cosmic Tech Mystery Results in Literal Lost Souls in This Sci-Fi Short Story - Gizmodo
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Why do narcissists avoid talking about the real issues?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Putin's uncompromising demands emerge after the latest round of Russia-Ukraine peace talks - AP News
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.